Haku
Viitteet 11-20 / 23
Elections hinder firms’ access to credit
(09.02.2022)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 3/2022
BOFIT Discussion Papers 3/2022
To analyze whether the occurrence of elections affects access to credit for firms, we perform an investigation using firm-level data covering 44 developed and developing countries. The results show that elections impair ...
Does bank efficiency affect the bank lending channel in China?
(08.02.2021)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 3/2021
BOFIT Discussion Papers 3/2021
This work examines the impact of bank efficiency on the bank lending channel in China. Using a sample of 175 Chinese banks over the period 2006–2017, we investigate how the reaction of the loan supply to monetary policy ...
Trade conflicts and credit supply spillovers : Evidence from the Nobel Peace Prize trade shock
(21.10.2022)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2022
BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2022
In this paper, we examine how a trade conflict’s impact on the real economy can be amplified by financial intermediaries. After the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee awarded the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize to Chinese dissident ...
Lending cycles and real outcomes : Costs of political misalignment
(21.01.2019)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 1/2019
BOFIT Discussion Papers 1/2019
We use data on the universe of credit in Turkey to document a strong political lending cycle. State-owned banks systematically adjust their lending around local elections compared with private banks in the same province. ...
What does peer-to-peer lending evidence say about the risk-taking channel of monetary policy?
(29.08.2019)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 16/2019
BOFIT Discussion Papers 16/2019
This paper uses loan application-level data from a peer-to-peer lending platform to study the risk-taking channel of monetary policy. By employing a direct ex-ante measure of risk-taking and estimating the simultaneous ...
Does lending relationship help or alleviate the transmission of liquidity shocks? Evidence from a liquidity crunch in China
(08.05.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 13/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 13/2018
We examine China’s June 2013 liquidity crunch as a negative shock to banks and analyze the wealth effects on exchange-listed firms. Our findings suggest that liquidity shocks to financial institutions negatively impact ...
Shock contagion, asset quality and lending behavior
(29.11.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 21/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 21/2018
This paper exploits the geopolitical conflict in Eastern Ukraine as a negative shock to banking sector and examines the shock transmission. We find that banks with more loans in the conflict areas during the pre-conflict ...
Herding behaviour in P2P lending markets
(14.11.2019)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 22/2019
BOFIT Discussion Papers 22/2019
We explore individual lender behaviour on Renrendai.com, a leading Chinese peer-to-peer (P2P) crowdlending platform. Using a sample of roughly 5 million investor-loan-hour observations and applying a high-dimension fixed ...
China's monetary policy and the loan market : How strong is the credit channel in China?
(09.08.2019)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 15/2019
BOFIT Discussion Papers 15/2019
We study the credit channel of Chinese monetary policy in a structural vector autoregressive framework. Using combinations of zero and sign restrictions, we identify monetary policy shocks linked to supply and demand ...
Technological innovation and the bank lending channel of monetary policy transmission
(20.12.2023)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/2023
BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/2023
This paper studies whether and how banks’ technological innovations affect the bank lending channel of monetary policy transmission. We first provide a theoretical model in which banks’ technological innovation relaxes ...