Haku
Viitteet 1-6 / 6
Risks in China’s financial system
(17.01.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 1/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 1/2018
Motivated by growing concerns about the risks and instability of China’s financial system, this article reviews several commonly perceived financial risks and discusses their roots in China’s politico-economic institutions. ...
The credit risk of Chinese households : A micro-level assessment
(07.05.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 12/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 12/2018
Household borrowing in China has increased considerably in recent years, raising concerns about the household sector’s vulnerability and implications for the stability of the financial system. We construct a number of ...
Oil price collapse and firm leverage in resource-dependent countries
(26.04.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 10/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 10/2018
This study examines the financial channel between oil price volatility and the resource curse using firm-level data. A collapse in oil prices adversely affects firm borrowing in resource-dependent countries. However, unlike ...
Permissible collateral and access to finance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
(31.01.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 3/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 3/2018
By allowing large classes of movable assets to be used as collateral, the Property Law reform trans-formed the secured transactions in China. Difference-in-differences tests show firms operating with ex-ante more movable ...
Does lending relationship help or alleviate the transmission of liquidity shocks? Evidence from a liquidity crunch in China
(08.05.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 13/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 13/2018
We examine China’s June 2013 liquidity crunch as a negative shock to banks and analyze the wealth effects on exchange-listed firms. Our findings suggest that liquidity shocks to financial institutions negatively impact ...
Shock contagion, asset quality and lending behavior
(29.11.2018)
BOFIT Discussion Papers 21/2018
BOFIT Discussion Papers 21/2018
This paper exploits the geopolitical conflict in Eastern Ukraine as a negative shock to banking sector and examines the shock transmission. We find that banks with more loans in the conflict areas during the pre-conflict ...