Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Kaisu etusivu
  • Suomen Pankki
  • Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers
  • Näytä viite
  •  
  • Suomen Pankki
  • Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers
  • Näytä viite

Innovation, reallocation and growth

Acemoglu, Daron; Akcigit, Ufuk; Bloom, Nicholas; Kerr, William (25.09.2013)

Avaa tiedosto
172650.pdf (724.2Kt)
Lataukset: 

Acemoglu, Daron
Akcigit, Ufuk
Bloom, Nicholas
Kerr, William

Julkaisusarja

Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers

Numero

22/2013

Julkaisija

Bank of Finland

2013

Tekijänoikeudet
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot

Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on

https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:bof-20140807385
Tiivistelmä
We build a model of firm-level innovation, productivity growth and reallocation featuring endogenous entry and exit. A key feature is the selection between high- and low-type firms, which differ in terms of their innovative capacity. We estimate the parameters of the model using detailed US Census micro data on firm-level output, R&D and patenting. The model provides a good t to the dynamics of firm entry and exit, output and R&D, and its implied elasticities are in the ballpark of a range of micro estimates. We find industrial policy subsidizing either the R&D or the continued operation of incumbents reduces growth and welfare. For example, a subsidy to incumbent R&D equivalent to 5% of GDP reduces welfare by about 1.5% because it deters entry of new high-type rms. On the contrary, substantial improvements (of the order of 5% improvement in welfare) are possible if the continued operation of incumbents is taxed while at the same time R&D by incumbents and new entrants is subsidized. This is because of a strong selection effect: R&D resources (skilled labor) are inefficiently used by low-type incumbent firms. Subsidies to incumbents encourage the survival and expansion of these firms at the expense of potential high-type entrants. We show that optimal policy encourages the exit of low-type firms and supports R&D by high-type incumbents and entry. JEL No. E2, L1, O31, O32 and O33 Keywords: entry, growth, industrial policy, innovation, R&D, reallocation, selection.

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuvuodetJulkaisijatJEL-luokituksetSivukartta

Aineiston tallentajille

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
Tietosuojaseloste
Saavutettavuusseloste
Suomen Pankin kirjasto
PL 160
00101 Helsinki
Puh. 09 183 2661
Sijainti: Rauhankatu 19, Helsinki

Palvelun tuottaja
Kansalliskirjasto